
new thinking, new marriage
innovative thinkers and the future of marriage
![]() |
“We come to love not by finding a perfect person but by learning to see an imperfect person perfectly.” – Sam Keen, To Love and Be Loved. |
'Is anyone else thinking what we're thinking?' That's a question we asked ourselves when we first developed the idea of marriage based not on 'family law' but on contract law.
Sure enough we found that a number of innovative thinkers had been seeking a new basis for marriage and parenting outside the family law system. Among them were writers, legal scholars, academics – even a Nobel-prize winning professor!
Let's get the state out of the marriage union. Celebrate marriage with a religious or secular ceremony, and create a partner contract aligning the couple legally.
Naomi Wolf. Author and journalist.
With marriage contracts that set out the couple’s commitments, there is little reason why judges should retain their current involvement in marriage.
Professor Gary S. Becker. Nobel Prize in Economics.
Why do people need the state's permission to marry? Let couples decide if they want the legal protections and obligations of a committed relationship.
Professor Stephanie Coontz
Why is marriage declining? One reason is because it has become a three-way contract between two people and the government.
Wendy McElroy. Author and journalist.
Get the government out of marriage and allow individuals to make their own marriage contracts, as befits a secular republic in the information age.
David Boaz. Vice President, Cato Institute.
With a pre-arranged parenting schedule, engaged people would have a window on what their future spouse will be like – and what he or she will expect – as a parent.
James Andrew Miller. Author and scriptwriter.
Marriage contracts enable individuals to make choices that further their particular vision of the family, without imposing that vision upon the whole of society.
Jamie Alan Aycock. Lawyer.
A fundamental problem with marriage is that it is a monopoly product supplied by the government. Couples should be able to create their own marriage contracts that reflect their values and expectations.
Colin PA Jones, Associate Professor of Law.
In our SlideShare.net presentation, entitled New Thinking, New Marriage, we've brought together a collection of thoughts from some eminent individuals who are re-thinking marriage for the 21st century.
Our slideshow has received 3,000+ hits. Got a comment or feedback you would like to share? We would love to hear from you.
about WeDo Marriage®
Empowering couples to design and fulfil their own personalised, commitment-focused marriage contracts.
new thinking, new marriage
Open your mind to what some innovative thinkers, writers, legal scholars and academics are saying about the future of marriage.
Google's Project 10 to 100
A call from Google for ideas to change the world. Read our submission about couple marriage and the benefits it will bring.
getting down to business
We're not in the business of 'reforming' state marriage. We are a business that will compete with the state in the marriage supply market.
innovation in relationships
Cohabitation – living together – was once merely non-marriage; now, through cohabitation contracts, it is a path to a new couple marriage.
state regulation not monopoly
Almost everything in the life works because contract law works. And marriage will come back to life when it works the way other things do.
making meaning
The core of entrepreneurship is to make meaning. Companies fundamentally founded for this purpose make a difference and succeed.
social enterprise
Social enterprises earn their income by providing products and services that benefit both consumers and the wider community too.
media page
News about WeDo Marriage Limited: an updated archive of our press releases, media interviews, blog reviews and articles.
contact us
Got a comment or a question about WeDo Marriage? We can't hear what you don't say.
Feel free to get in touch.
![]() |
“Believe me, it's not like we agreed on everything. But here's the thing. We loved, loved, loved each other so much when we were done answering the questions. WHETHER OR NOT WE AGREED WITH EACH OTHER. That was key. We felt so close.” – Susan Piver, The Hard Questions. |


